'All Industries Frontline Practitioners

Date
Time
4:00 - 5:30 p.m.
Language
All Sector / Industry
On
Course Outline
Corruption prone areas in the business sector
Legal and administrative controls
Handling of conflict of interests
Role of staff in corruption prevention
Zero tolerance toward corruption
ICAC resources and services
Target
Frontline Practitioners
Course Full
Off
CPD Course
Off
Course Title Industry
Course Title Object

All industries (Managerial Staff)

Date
Time
4:00 - 5:00 p.m.
Language
All Sector / Industry
On
Course Outline
Corruption prone areas in the business sector
Legal and administrative controls
Handling of conflict of interests
Tips on managing staff integrity
Integrity management in action
ICAC resources and services
Target
Managerial Staff
Course Full
Off
CPD Course
Off
Course Title Industry
Course Title Object

Waitress charged by ICAC guilty of bribing Labour Department staff in wages and severance payment claim

A waitress charged by the ICAC was convicted today (June 25) at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts of offering bribes consisting of a supermarket voucher and cash worth totalling $350 to two staff members of the Labour Department (LD) for assisting her in filing a claim for wages and severance payment against her former employer. Her offers were rejected by the LD staff.

Ting Shuk-fan, 52, was found guilty after trial of two counts of offering an advantage to a public servant, contrary to Section 4(1)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.

Magistrate Mr Tobias Cheng Yun-chung adjourned the case to July 15 for sentencing, pending the defendant’s background report. The defendant was remanded in custody of the Correctional Services Department.

The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint referred by the LD. Between February 2012 and June 2019, the defendant was employed by a caterer. In mid-August 2024, she submitted a claim form to the LD regarding her claim against the caterer for wages and severance payment.

Under the Employment Ordinance, there is a statutory time limit of three months for filing a claim for severance payment. As the defendant filed her claim after this deadline, an Assistant Clerical Officer of the LD assisted her in applying for an extension of the time limit to facilitate her claim and to arrange a conciliation meeting between herself and her former employer.

The court heard that on August 30, 2024, the defendant offered a supermarket cash voucher worth $50 to the Assistant Clerical Officer of the LD for assisting her in continuing her claim against her former employer. The Assistant Clerical Officer immediately declined the offer and reported the matter to a supervisor.

The defendant was later informed by an Assistant Labour Officer of the LD that her former employer would not send a representative to attend the conciliation meeting as the defendant had resigned voluntarily. The Assistant Labour Officer then advised the defendant to pursue the claim through the Labour Tribunal.

On December 16, 2024, the defendant offered $300 in cash to the Assistant Labour Officer by registered mail for assisting her in continuing her claim against her former employer. The Assistant Labour Officer immediately reported the matter to a supervisor.

The LD rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.

The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Bernard Yuen, assisted by ICAC officer Stanley Cheung.

The ICAC reminds the public that bribing public servants is a serious offence carrying a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment and a fine of $500,000 upon conviction.

Import Data

A waitress charged by the ICAC was convicted today (June 25) at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts of offering bribes consisting of a supermarket voucher and cash worth totalling $350 to two staff members of the Labour Department (LD) for assisting her in filing a claim for wages and severance payment against her former employer. Her offers were rejected by the LD staff.

Ting Shuk-fan, 52, was found guilty after trial of two counts of offering an advantage to a public servant, contrary to Section 4(1)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.

Magistrate Mr Tobias Cheng Yun-chung adjourned the case to July 15 for sentencing, pending the defendant’s background report. The defendant was remanded in custody of the Correctional Services Department.

The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint referred by the LD. Between February 2012 and June 2019, the defendant was employed by a caterer. In mid-August 2024, she submitted a claim form to the LD regarding her claim against the caterer for wages and severance payment.

Under the Employment Ordinance, there is a statutory time limit of three months for filing a claim for severance payment. As the defendant filed her claim after this deadline, an Assistant Clerical Officer of the LD assisted her in applying for an extension of the time limit to facilitate her claim and to arrange a conciliation meeting between herself and her former employer.

The court heard that on August 30, 2024, the defendant offered a supermarket cash voucher worth $50 to the Assistant Clerical Officer of the LD for assisting her in continuing her claim against her former employer. The Assistant Clerical Officer immediately declined the offer and reported the matter to a supervisor.

The defendant was later informed by an Assistant Labour Officer of the LD that her former employer would not send a representative to attend the conciliation meeting as the defendant had resigned voluntarily. The Assistant Labour Officer then advised the defendant to pursue the claim through the Labour Tribunal.

On December 16, 2024, the defendant offered $300 in cash to the Assistant Labour Officer by registered mail for assisting her in continuing her claim against her former employer. The Assistant Labour Officer immediately reported the matter to a supervisor.

The LD rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.

The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Bernard Yuen, assisted by ICAC officer Stanley Cheung.

The ICAC reminds the public that bribing public servants is a serious offence carrying a maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment and a fine of $500,000 upon conviction.

Reference URL: https://www.icac.org.hk/en/p/press/index_id_4974.html

Source industry: Catering

Industry Tgas

From small gifts to blatant bribe

Cover
Image
From small gifts to blatant bribe
Media Feed Source ID
cases_108_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] From small gifts to blatant bribe https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/50 Intro: Leo, a head chef, was busy with sourcing food suppliers for the hotel’s recent promotional event. His old classmate, a food supplier, offered a ‘tempting deal’ in return for his help. https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/2e8512d0a590a7301ce2d836ed933fff.png [ZH-HANT] 糖衣陷阱 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/50 Intro: 酒店總廚Leo正忙於為即將舉行的美食節尋找食品供應商,他的舊同學是其中一名供應商,並向他提出了一項非常吸引的條件以換取他的幫助。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/2e8512d0a590a7301ce2d836ed933fff.png [ZH-HANS] 糖衣陷阱 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/50 Intro: 酒店总厨Leo正忙于为即将举行的美食节寻找食品供应商,他的旧同学是其中一名供应商,并向他提出了一项非常吸引的条件以换取他的帮助。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/2e8512d0a590a7301ce2d836ed933fff.png
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_108

Turning a blind eye

Cover
Image
Turning a blind eye
Media Feed Source ID
cases_107_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] Turning a blind eye https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/3 Intro: The chief chef of a hotel accepted bribes from a food supplier for turning a blind eye to the substandard food supply. https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c55fae12b0c05d7309794f8f8f2cfcf3.jpg [ZH-HANT] 視而不見 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/3 Intro: 一間酒店的主廚接受食品供應商的賄賂,對所供應的不合格食材視而不見。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c55fae12b0c05d7309794f8f8f2cfcf3.jpg [ZH-HANS] 视而不见 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/3 Intro: 一间酒店的主厨接受食品供应商的贿赂,对所供应的不合格食材视而不见。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c55fae12b0c05d7309794f8f8f2cfcf3.jpg
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_107

Gain from authority

Cover
Image
Gain from authority
Media Feed Source ID
cases_106_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] Gain from authority https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/239 Intro: Emma, who was responsible for procurement, intentionally concealed her marital relationship with Eric in declaration documents to the company during the tendering exercise and even helped him secure the contract. https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/4da2d63010dc29c54df27f3b9879f156.jpg [ZH-HANT] 以權謀私 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/239 Intro: 負責採購的Emma在招標過程中向其公司提交的申報文件中故意隱瞞了她與Eric的婚姻關係,甚至還幫助Eric取得了採購合約。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/4da2d63010dc29c54df27f3b9879f156.jpg [ZH-HANS] 以权谋私 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/239 Intro: 负责采购的Emma在招标过程中向其公司提交的申报文件中故意隐瞒了她与Eric的婚姻关系,甚至还帮助Eric取得了采购合约。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/4da2d63010dc29c54df27f3b9879f156.jpg
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_106

Chaotic sales record

Cover
Image
Chaotic sales record
Media Feed Source ID
cases_105_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] Chaotic sales record https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/238 Intro: Daisy, who worked at a chain fast-food restaurant, discovered that the assistant manager Diana was manipulating the sales data for personal gain. What should Daisy do? https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/d49a21b8aa4c3da17f3bd5ddee157d0b.jpg [ZH-HANT] 賬目不清 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/238 Intro: 在連鎖快餐店工作的Daisy發現助理經理Diana為了謀取私利而操控銷售記錄,她應該如何處理? https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/d49a21b8aa4c3da17f3bd5ddee157d0b.jpg [ZH-HANS] 账目不清 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/238 Intro: 在连锁快餐店工作的Daisy发现助理经理Diana为了谋取私利而操控销售记录,她应该如何处理? https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/d49a21b8aa4c3da17f3bd5ddee157d0b.jpg
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_105

Gift with a hidden agenda

Cover
Image
Gift with a hidden agenda
Media Feed Source ID
cases_104_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] Gift with a hidden agenda https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/237 Intro: A branch manager of a restaurant Carl put himself in a difficult position after accepted an expensive watch from his subordinate Charles for providing preferential treatment when arranging the work schedules. https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c36c2bd1847e989b4423294d84e9132d.jpg [ZH-HANT] 別有用心 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/237 Intro: 任職餐廳的分店經理Carl,因接受下屬Charles送贈的一隻名貴手錶而在安排工作值勤表時給予優待,使他陷入了困境。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c36c2bd1847e989b4423294d84e9132d.jpg [ZH-HANS] 别有用心 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/237 Intro: 任职餐厅的分店经理Carl,因接受下属Charles送赠的一只名贵手表而在安排工作值勤表时给予优待,使他陷入了困境。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/c36c2bd1847e989b4423294d84e9132d.jpg
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_104

Bidding low

Cover
Image
Bidding low
Media Feed Source ID
cases_103_cover_en
Import Data
[EN] Bidding low https://hkbedc.icac.hk/en/resources/case_studies/240 Intro: Alpha, the director of a restaurant group, relied on his engineering expert Ayden to select contractors, but Ayden exploited this trust by soliciting bribes from contractor and manipulating contract sizes to evade oversight. https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/1c89c6927ef59d20429835ddb73b56bb.jpg [ZH-HANT] 低價競標 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/240 Intro: Alpha是一家餐飲集團的總監,他依賴工程師Ayden來選擇承建商,但Ayden利用這種信任,向承建商索取賄賂,並操控合約金額以逃避監管。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/1c89c6927ef59d20429835ddb73b56bb.jpg [ZH-HANS] 低价竞标 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/zh-hant/resources/case_studies/240 Intro: Alpha是一家餐饮集团的总监,他依赖工程师Ayden来选择承建商,但Ayden利用这种信任,向承建商索取贿赂,并操控合约金额以逃避监管。 https://hkbedc.icac.hk/cache/img/1c89c6927ef59d20429835ddb73b56bb.jpg
All Trades/ Industries
Off
migration_resource_id
cases_103
Survey Questions
1. In which country or region are you currently located?
Hong Kong
Chinese Mainland
Other (please specify)
2. What type of organisation do you represent?
Listed company
Large private company
SME / start-up
NGO / non-profit
Public organisation
Chamber / trade association
Other (please specify)
3. What is the size of your organisation?
1 - 49 employees
50-99 employees
100 - 249 employees
250 or more employees
4. What is your staff level or position?
Executive / senior management
Middle management
Professional
Supervisory level
Frontline/Technical Staff
Other (please specify)

Thank you for your feedback.